Showing 1 - 10 of 74
follow any single notion of fairness or inequality aversion. In addition, the results suggest that efficiency concerns are …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005423933
preferences do not reflect the maximization of individual welfare, it is argued that welfare,rather than preferences, has …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005423938
contributions individuals control), efficiency, need and equality. We conclude that stakeholders typically exhibit a “fairness bias …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008558552
Global environmental problems are often assumed to imply extensive inefficiencies since there is no global authority corresponding to the government at a national level. This paper shows, on the contrary, that rich countries in a free unregulated market may still undertake globally efficient...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005651775
We show that peer sanctioning increases cooperation in public goods experiments more in unequally endowed groups than in equally endowed groups. Punishment results in a redistribution of wealth from high to low endowment players within groups. <p>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005423962
This paper shows how a developing country, Lao PDR, imports high glutinous rice prices by exporting its staple food to neighboring countries, Vietnam and Thailand. Lao PDR has extensive export controls on rice, generating a sizable difference between domestic and international prices. Controls...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011082588
In this paper we assume that choice of commodities at the individual (household) level is made in the budget set and that the choice can be described by a probability density function. We prove that negativity (()0xExp<) is valid for one(x) or two choice variables (x, y) (No Giffen good).Negativity at the market level is valid by summation. The expected demand functions are homogeneous of degree zero in prices and income. We use general positive continuous functions f(x), f(x, y) defined on the bounded budget set. We transform them into probability density functions to calculate E(x) and prove negativity. The present approach use simple assumptions and is descriptive in its nature. Any choice behaviour that can be described by a continuous density function gives the above results. (,,)xyppm Why not keep descriptions as simple as possible?<p>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008643877
See paper
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009645809
In this paper we assume that choice of commodities at the individual (household) level is made inside the budget set and that the choice can be described by a probability density function. We prove that law of demand()0xExpis valid for one(x) or two choice variables (x, y)*. The law of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008469624
This paper looks at the fuel choice of urban households in major Ethiopian cities, using panel data collected in 2000 and 2004. It examines use of multiple fuels by households in some detail, a topic not much explored in the household fuel-choice literature in general, and in sub-Saharan Africa...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008469627