Showing 1 - 5 of 5
We examine the expected economic benefits of mergers and acquisitions. We conclude that both signaling and revelation biases are responsible for the commonly reported finding that on average takeovers are harmful to bidder shareholder wealth. After accounting for these two biases that lead to a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013115049
CEO narcissism affects the M&A process. More narcissistic target CEOs obtain higher bid premiums. Acquirer shareholders react less favorably to a takeover announcement when the target CEO is more narcissistic. Among acquiring CEOs, narcissism is associated with initiating deals and negotiating...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013115105
return performance after deal completion. Overall, our paper uncovers a previously undocumented role of M&A and suggests that …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013068824
Using a large unique patent-merger dataset over the period 1984-2006, we uncover one specific source of synergies - corporate innovation activities - that drives acquisitions. Our measures of corporate innovation capture both quantity and quality of innovation output, as well as the extent of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013068868
Over the past two decades, cross-border M&As have totaled over eight trillion dollars and have fluctuated widely from year to year. In this paper, I establish four key facts about the dynamic patterns of cross-border mergers and the factors that drive them: Cross-border mergers come in waves...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012976114