Showing 1 - 10 of 14
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001068829
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001200990
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003214576
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002912673
First via a counter example it is shown that the Proposition 3 of Anbarci & Sun (2013) is false. Then a gap and a mistake in their proof are identified. Finally, a modified version of their Proposition 3 is stated and proved.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011098623
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010617986
These notes consist of two parts. In the rst one I present a counter example to Proposition 3 of Anbarci & Sun (2013). In the second part I propose a correction based on an axiom similar to one used by Salonen (1988) in the rst axiomatization of the Discrete Raia solution.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010633749
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008631391
The present paper tries in a largely non-technical way to discuss the aim, the basic notions and methods as well as the limits of game theory under the aspect of providing a general modelling method or language for social sciences.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008631415
Howard (1992) argues that the Nash bargaining solution is not Nash implementable, as it does not satisfy Maskin monotonicity. His arguments can be extended to other bargaining solutions as well. However, by de.ning a social choice correspondence that is based on the solution rather than on its...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005002290