Showing 1 - 10 of 15
Cartels may be exempted from competition law if they sufficiently promote sustainability objectives. To qualify, the collusive agreement should not fully eliminate competition. We study how remaining and fringe competition affect incentives to produce more sustainably under semi-collusion in an...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012926246
Benchmark rates, such as Libor and Euribor, have been proven vulnerable to manipulation. We analyze benchmark rate collusion, which is challenging due to varying and opposing trading interests of the subset of market participants that determine the rates. Our theory is based on two mechanisms....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012901653
We revisit classic cartel stability theory to show how comparative statics on sustainability change when firms require a margin before colluding. Such a margin can compensate, for instance, for the cost of colluding, antitrust liabilities or the risk of cartel breakdown. We show that the cartel...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012899768
Several competition authorities consider the exemption of horizontal agreements among firms from antitrust liability if the agreements sufficiently promote public interest objectives such as sustainable consumption and production. We show that when consumers value sustainable products and firms...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012936659
To stimulate companies to take corporate social responsibility collectively, for example for climate change or fair trade, their agreements may be exempted from cartel law. To qualify under Article 101(3) TFEU, the public benefits must compensate consumers for higher prices of the private good....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012855753
Industry-wide voluntary agreements are touted as a means for corporations to take more corporate social responsibility (CSR). We study what type of joint CSR agreement induces competitors to increase CSR efforts in a model of oligopolistic competition with differentiated products. Consumers have...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013220611
Inequality concerns in antitrust could justify market power in return for a fairer allocation by weighing the consumer welfare of disadvantaged groups more heavily. A simple example illustrates how seeking distributive justice through lenient antitrust enforcement is effective nor efficient....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013221024
Against the background of growing discontent over excessive leniency of US and EU competition policy, this article argues that the policy displays characteristics corresponding to those that brought about the social capture of financial policy co-responsible for the late 2000s global crisis. The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013238761
The Dutch Authority for Consumers and Markets and the EU Commission have published proposals to green antitrust. Based on the assumption that Article 101(3) TFEU allows collective action, both competition agencies suggest different routes to re-interpret the consumer benefit and indispensability...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013291006
Competition law has always formed a core pillar of the European integration process and so it was among the crucial EU requirements set for the candidate countries. Competition law had a significant influence on the way competition laws and institutions were shaped in the candidate countries. In...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014150890