This judgment seems likely to encourage claimants for whom the English High Court is fast becoming the forum of choice for follow-on damages actions in antitrust cases. Ruchit Patel, Cleary Gottlieb

The Canadian system may provide some useful lessons for those jurisdictions contemplating a move towards increased private litigation, Davit Akman, Adam Fanaki, & Mark Katz (Davies Ward)

Regardless of the outcome, the CREA case will be an important and needed addition to the small universe of Canadian abuse cases, Steve Szentesi (Norton Stewart)

Why was one traditional, well established plus-factors pleading “plausible†and a very similar one “implausible� Chris Sagers (Cleveland State Univ.)

Minn-Chem v. Agrium is the latest in a long line of opinions reflecting courts’ suspicions of private plaintiff efforts to expand the scope of private antitrust enforcement. Max Huffman (Indiana Univ.)

Enforcement restraint is particularly appropriate in circumstances where the conduct at issue, insofar as Canada is concerned, was not illegal at all. Mark Katz & Erika Douglas (Davies, Ward)

The court did not appreciate the difference between price setting in differentiated and undifferentiated markets. Herbert Hovenkamp (Univ. of Iowa)

The allegations that led to those convictions make strange reading today, for they contain almost nothing by way of economic analysis. Marc Levinson (Article & Interview)

The continuing fire over how to assess the competitive effects of single-firm conduct received yet more gasoline in the wake of the U.S. Federal Trade Commission’s settlement of its antitrust case against Intel. Timothy Brennan (University of Maryland, Baltimore County)

Minority shareholdings are a common occurrence and, while the vast majority are wholly unproblematic, Ryanair illustrates how different jurisdictional tests can lead to unsatisfactory outcomes. Christian Riis-Madsen, Sophia Stephanou, & Killian Kehoe (O’Melveny & Myers)