Showing 1 - 3 of 3
This study shows that (a) project valuation via CAPM contradicts valuation via arbitrage pricing, (b) CAPM-minded decision makers may fail to profit from arbitrage opportunities, (c) Standard CAPM-based valuation violates value additivity. As a consequence, the use of CAPM for project valuation...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004988330
This article shows that the Capital Asset Pricing Model-based capital budgeting criteria proposed by Tuttle and Litzenberger (1968), Mossin (1969), Hamada (1969), Stapleton (1971), Rubinstein (1973), Bierman and Hass (1973) and Bogue and Roll (1974) are equivalent. They all state that a project...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10004988356
Two measures of excess profit are currently available in the literature: Economic Value Added (EVA) (Stewart, 1991) and Systemic Value Added (SVA) (Magni, 2003a, b, 2004; 2005). This study shows that, unlike EVA, SVA is symmetric and additively coherent. Also, EVA and SVA are not simply different in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005495918