Showing 1 - 10 of 29
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011844755
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012258993
The paper compares the cointegration methods of Johansen and Bierens by means of simulations and a real world example. Drawing on the fact developed in a companion paper that the Johansen procedure has robustness properties against ARMA systems and the Bierens procedure is designed for ARMA...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010291926
In systems of variables with a specified or already identified cointegrating rank, stationarity of component variates can be tested by a simple restriction test. The implied decision is often in conflict with the outcome of unit root tests on the same variables. Using a framework of Bayes...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010292762
This paper investigates by means of Monte Carlo techniques the robustness of the CUSUM and CUSUM-of-squares tests (Brown et al., 1975) to serial correlation, endogeneity and lack of structural invariance. Our findings suggest that these tests perform better in the context of a dynamic model of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010293734
This paper presents results concerning the performance of both single equation and system panel cointegration tests and estimators. The study considers the tests developed in Pedroni (1999, 2004), Westerlund (2005), Larsson, Lyhagen, and Löthgren (2001) and Breitung (2005); and the estimators...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010293988
In this paper we present finite T mean and variance correction factors and corresponding response surface regressions for the panel cointegration tests presented in Pedroni (1999, 2004), Westerlund (2005), Larsson et al. (2001), and Breitung (2005). For the single equation tests we consider up...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010294038
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011589857
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010519616
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002026439