Showing 1 - 10 of 19
choices from a laboratory experiment. The equilibrium predicts that the large battlefield receives more than a proportional …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010224988
We report experimental data from bargaining situations where bargainers can make proposals as often and whenever they want, and can communicate via written messages. We vary the set of feasible contracts, thereby allowing us to assess the focality of three properties of bargaining outcomes:...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011384455
The unravelling prediction of disclosure theory relies on the idea that strategic forces lead firms (information senders) to voluntarily disclose information about the quality of their products provided the information disclosed is verifiable and the costs of disclosure are negligible. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012131654
Using experimental methods, this paper investigates the limits of communication and leadership in aiding group coordination in a minimum effort game. Choosing the highest effort is the payoff dominant Nash equilibrium in this game, and communication and leadership are expected to help in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011318403
competitive promotion, by engaging in retaliatory aggressive behavior. We present a benchmark experiment where two players have an …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003990149
; innovation ; dynamics ; experiment …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003675303
We study a legislative bargaining game in which failure to agree in a given round may result in a breakdown of negotiations. In that case, each player receives an exogenous `disagreement value'. We characterize the set of stationary subgame perfect equilibria under all q-majority rules. Under...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011434323
This paper extends the Baron-Ferejohn model of legislative bargaining to general weighted majority games with two modifications: first, payoff division can only be agreed upon after the coalition has formed (two-stage bargaining); second, negotiations in the coalition can break down, in which...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003675312
This paper studies a noncooperative allocation procedure for coalitional games with veto players. The procedure is similar to the one presented by Dagan et al. (1997) for bankruptcy problems. According to it, a player, the proposer, makes a proposal that the remaining players must accept or...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009578191
This paper studies an extensive form game of coalition formation with random proposers in games with externalities. It is shown that an agreement will be reached without delay if any set of coalitions profits from merging. Even under this strong condition, the equilibrium coalition structure is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012650908