Showing 1 - 10 of 1,843
Regional transfers are assumed to have an impact on the public opinion towards the benefactor, but empirical evidence is still scarce. In this paper we test this hypothesis for the structural funds of the European Union (EU) by combining detailed data on regional transfers with public opinion...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009229184
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001893491
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10000940777
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001331504
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001370564
The European Union (EU) provides grants to disadvantaged regions of member states to allow them to catch up with the EU average. Under the Objective 1 scheme, NUTS2 regions with a GDP per capita level below 75% of the EU average qualify for structural funds transfers from the central EU budget....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012765692
We explore the role of the transfers that UK regions received from the European structural and cohesion funds, as well as other economic and social factors, in determining the support for the Remain vote in the Brexit referendum, and that past European transfers have played virtually no role in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012979586
The additionality principle says that the funds of the European Union should not replace, but be an addition to national regional policy funds. The benchmark for the co-funding is that the EU bears 50% of total costs associated with regional projects eligible for EU support. In some regions,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013147267
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009632340
The 2030 Agenda has been adopted on a global level, but its implementation must also take place at the local level (Cavalli, 2018). The integration between the different levels of government - supranational, national and local - is essential; they must necessarily cooperate and coordinate their...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012292066