Showing 1 - 10 of 14
This paper discusses the influence of public ownership on trade policy instruments. We demonstrate three important invariance results. First, the degree of public ownership affects neither the level of socially optimal activities nor welfare if the government chooses optimal trade policy...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005100665
This paper makes some steps toward a formal political economy of environmental policy. Economists' quasi-unanimous preferences for sophisticated incentive regulation is reconsidered. First, we recast the question of instrument choice in the general mechanism literature and provide an incomplete...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005100845
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002116429
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003989209
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003557206
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001743532
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001743554
Twenty years ago, Harvard Business School economist and strategy professor Michael Porter stood conventional wisdom about the impact of environmental regulation on business on its head by declaring that well designed regulation could actually enhance competitiveness. The traditional view of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008511751
Jaffe and Palmer (1997) present three distinct variants of the so-called Porter Hypothesis. The weak version of the hypothesis posits that environmental regulation will stimulate certain kinds of environmental innovations. The narrow version of the hypothesis asserts that flexible environmental...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005100732
It is generally recognized that firms face both internal and external pressure to improve their environmental performance. However, few studies have attempted to delineate the importance of those various sources of pressure as firms' managers themselves perceive them. In this study, we show that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005100910