Showing 1 - 5 of 5
Many argue that redistricting reform will reduce partisanship in the state legislature. They base this claim on two assumptions: (1) legislators respond strongly to the competitiveness of their districts, and (2) the 2001 redistricting made districts less competitive. The second assumption is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014589721
Jarvis (2009) argues that ideological polarization in California’s state legislature creates unique problems for the … state because of the interaction between polarization and the requirement that the budget pass with a 2/3 supermajority … order to reduce polarization. However, that is the wrong solution. Increasing the number of competitive districts would have …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014589723
to the nature of the state's finances, partisan polarization in the legislature interacts with many of these to produce … polarization or possibly even provide an occasional supermajority. While districts are not necessarily the primary cause of …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014589726
Over the past 50 years, partisan polarization—the ideological distance between the typical Democratic and the average … Republican legislator—has widened in California. This article asks whether growing polarization has led to increasing legislative … legislative party polarization exerts no direct effect, but that higher levels of polarization magnify the impact of divided …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014589791
A number of incremental electoral reforms have not measurably improved government performance in California. In this research note, we simulate and map electoral outcomes under a simple form of proportional representation: 16 five-seat districts for the 80-seat California Assembly. In addition...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014589823