Showing 1 - 10 of 21
This paper provides strong evidence supporting the long-standing speculation that decision-making in groups has a dark side, by magnifying the prevalence of anti-social behavior towards outsiders. A large-scale experiment implemented in Slovakia and Uganda (N=2,309) reveals that deciding in a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011949115
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003443732
We investigate the potential of transparency to influence committee decision-making. We present a model in which career concerned committee members receive private information of different type-dependent accuracy, deliberate and vote. We study three levels of transparency under which career...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010516456
This paper investigates collective denial and willful blindness in groups, organizations and markets. Agents with anticipatory preferences, linked through an interaction structure, choose how to interpret and recall public signals about future prospects. Wishful thinking (denial of bad news) is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009729409
We study cooperation within and between groups in the laboratory, comparing treatments in which two groups have previously been (i) in conflict with one another, (ii) in conflict with a different group, or (iii) not previously exposed to conflict. We model conflict using an inter-group Tullock...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010379230
Extending the die rolling experiment of Fischbacher and Föllmi-Heusi (2013), we compare gender effects with respect to unethical behavior by individuals and by two-person groups. In contrast to individual decisions, gender matters strongly under group decisions. We find more lying in male...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010404039
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003830905
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011408095
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002160846
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003294057