Showing 1 - 10 of 22
The 'China shock' operated in part through the housing market, and that is an important reason why the China shock was as big as it was. If housing prices had not responded at all to the China shock, then the total employment effect of the China shock would have been reduced by more than...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012480375
Dooley et al (2003, 2004a,b,c) argue that China seeks to raise urban employment by 10-12 million persons per year, with about 30% of that coming from export growth. In fact, total employment increased by 7.5-8 million per year over 1997-2005. We estimate that export growth over 1997-2002...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012465094
We examine the employment responses to import competition from China and to global export expansion from the United States, both of which have been expanding strongly during the past decades. We find that although Chinese imports reduce jobs, at both the industry level and the local commuting...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012453657
We quantify the impact on U.S. employment from imports and exports during 1995-2011, using the World Input-Output Database. We find that the growth in U.S. exports led to increased demand for 2 million jobs in manufacturing, 0.5 million in resource industries, and a remarkable 4.1 million jobs...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012453691
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003785769
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003413407
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003388955
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009664146
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010341232
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001777411