Showing 1 - 4 of 4
Econometricians have been claiming proudly since World War II that significance testing is the empirical side of economics. In fact today most young economists think that the word “empirical” simply means “collect enough data to do a significance test”. Tjalling Koopmans’s influential...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010571464
In several dozen journal reviews and in many other comments we have received—from, for example, four Nobel laureates, the statistician Dennis Lindley (2012), the statistician Arnold Zellner (2004), the mathematician Olle Häggström (2010), the sociologist Steve Fuller (2008), and the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011133031
Economics will always have few women so long as Max U rules the roost.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008484269
Significance testing as used has no theoretical justification. Our article in the Journal of Economic Literature (1996) showed that of the 182 full-length papers published in the 1980s in the American Economic Review 70% did not distinguish economic from statistical significance. Since 1996 many...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008484398