Showing 1 - 10 of 18
We show by counterexample that Proposition 2 in Fernandez-Villaverde, Rubio-RamÌrez, and Santos (Econometrica (2006), 74, 93-119) is false. We also show that even if their Proposition 2 were corrected, it would be irrelevant for parameter estimates. As a more constructive contribution, we...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008456360
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010692326
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011026253
Asymptotic justification of the bootstrap often takes the form of weak convergence of the bootstrap distribution to some limit distribution. Theoretical literature recognized that the weak convergence does not imply consistency of the bootstrap second moment or the bootstrap variance as an...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012637174
We develop a new specification test for IV estimators adopting a particular second order approximation of Bekker. The new specification test compares the difference of the forward (conventional) 2SLS estimator of the coefficient of the right-hand side endogenous variable with the reverse 2SLS...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005332249
This paper introduces an alternative estimator for the linear censored quantile regression model. The estimator also applies to cases where the censoring point is unknown. Since the objective function is globally convex and the estimator is a solution to a linear programming problem, a global...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005332302
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005332305
Fixed effects estimators of panel models can be severely biased because of the well-known incidental parameters problem. We show that this bias can be reduced by using a panel jackknife or an analytical bias correction motivated by large T. We give bias corrections for averages over the fixed...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005332979
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005231472
The role of propensity score in the efficient estimation of the average treatment effects is examined. If the treatment is ignorable given some observed characteristics, it is shown that the propensity score is ancillary for estimation of the average treatment effects but not for estimation of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005170316