Showing 1 - 8 of 8
We identify the maximal number of people who are harmed when a social choice rule is manipulated. If there are n individuals, then for any <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$$k$$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> greater than 0 and less than n, there is a neutral rule for which the maximal number is <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX">$$k$$</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, and there is an anonymous rule for which the maximum...</equationsource></inlineequation></equationsource></inlineequation>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010993545
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008775589
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005061261
The individual preference domain is the family of profiles of economic preferences on the set of allocations of public or private goods, or both. The agenda domain assumption allows for a finite lower bound on the size of a feasible set. If a social choice correspondence satisfies nonimposition,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005753265
If only the strict part of social preference is required to be transitive then Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives implies that there is a coalition containing all but one individual that cannot force x to be socially ranked above y for at least half of the pairs of alternatives (x,y).
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005753384
We characterize strategy-proof social choice procedures when choice sets need not be singletons. Sets are compared by leximin. For a strategy-proof rule g, there is a positive integer k such that either (i) the choice sets g(r) for all profiles r have the same cardinality k and there is an...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005596730
Assuming an odd number of voters, E. S. Maskin recently provided a characterization of majority rule based on full transitivity. This paper characterizes majority rule with a set of axioms that includes two of Maskin's, dispenses with another, and contains weak versions of his other two axioms....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005370724
A feasible alternative x is a strong Condorcet winner if for every other feasible alternative y there is some majority coalition that prefers x to y. Let <InlineEquation ID="Equ1"> <EquationSource Format="TEX"><![CDATA[${\cal L}_{C}$]]></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> (resp., <InlineEquation ID="Equ2"> <EquationSource Format="TEX"><![CDATA[$\wp_{C})$]]></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> denote the set of all profiles of linear (resp., merely asymmetric) individual preference relations for which a strong Condorcet...</equationsource></inlineequation></equationsource></inlineequation>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005371154