Showing 1 - 8 of 8
I show that aggregate-taking behavior is often evolutionarily stable for finite population in symmetric games in which payoff depends only on own strategy and an aggregate. I provide economic examples exhibiting this phenomenon. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005370762
In the evolutionary setting for a financial market developed by Blume and Easley (1992), we consider an infinitely repeated version of a model á la Grossman and Stiglitz (1980) with asymmetrically informed traders. Informed traders observe the realisation of a payoff relevant signal before...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005370946
We formulate an evolutionary learning process with trembles for static games of incomplete information. For many games, if the amount of trembling is small, play will be in accordance with the games’ (strict) Bayesian equilibria most of the time. This supports the notion of Bayesian...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005371151
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005155369
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005753143
coordination game correspond to invariant distributions of the process, hence evolution of play is not ergodic but instead depends …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005753155
I examine a Knightian (1921) model of risk using a general equilibrium model of investment and trade. A population of agents with various preference types can choose between a safe production technology and a risky production technology. In addition, the distribution of types of agents changes...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005753386
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005597892