Showing 1 - 10 of 141
This paper develops a simple test à la Pesaran (2007) for the null hypothesis of stationarity in heterogeneous panel …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011041587
run, using two recent powerful panel data stationarity tests accounting for cross-sectional dependence and a structural …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010594094
This paper theoretically explains why bias correction appears in two statistics recently developed by Baltagi et al. (2011, 2012), which are designed to test the sphericity and cross-sectional dependence of the errors in the fixed effects panel model respectively. Our explanation shows that the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011041555
In an influential paper, Pesaran [Pesaran, M.H. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74, 967–1012] proposes a very simple estimator of factor-augmented regressions that has since then become very popular. In this note...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011041647
It is widely known that size distortions of the so-called KPSS stationarity test, introduced in Kwiatkowski et …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011041723
Castagnetti et al. (2015) propose two max-type statistics to test for the presence of a factor structure in a large stationary panel data model. In this contribution, we study the use of Hausman-type statistics based on the CCE estimator of Pesaran (2006) and the IE estimator developed by Bai...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011263407
In this paper, we consider a cointegrated panel data model with non-stationary common factors, which, because of its appeal in many economic applications, has received much attention in the recent literature. By deriving a Granger-type representation theorem, we obtain several equivalent model...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010688093
Applications of panel unit root tests have become commonplace in empirical economics, yet there are ambiguities as how best to interpret the test results. This note clarifies that rejection of the panel unit root hypothesis should be interpreted as evidence that a statistically significant...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010594095
We show that the CUSUM and LM tests for structural change in the volatility process enjoy monotonic power. The framework is general including many recently proposed non-stationary GARCH-type models. The result is in contrast to the well-known issue of non-monotonic power for the CUSUM-based...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010702780
income inequality is likely to grow in the 21st century. It is shown that the null hypothesis of trend stationarity of …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011189531