Showing 1 - 10 of 77
We analyze the formation of bilateral R&D collaborations in an oligopoly when each firm benefits from the research done by other firms it is connected to. In contrast to myopic stability, farsighted stability leads to R&D networks consisting of two minimally connected components, with the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011116200
Consider the Hotelling linear spatial duopoly with firm uncertainty over the consumer mean. As uncertainty about the mean grows relative to the dispersion of consumers, competitive locations become socially optimal. A limit result for discontinuous, log-concave densities is also established.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010580457
recapture ratios which can be usefully applied in merger and competition cases …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012932324
exit. We show that the government should raise the entry tax when a merger reduces the total number of firms entering. …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010662395
Fershtman and Judd (1987) and Sklivas (1987) have shown that strategic delegation under price competition makes firm owners choose incentive contracts that induce managers to be soft in order to reduce competitive intensity. We show in a worked-out example that under sufficiently strong network...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010580465
Presenting a novel model of local shopping, the benefit of monopoly provision due to market size effects is explored. Prices are lower, variety and aggregate consumer surplus higher, than local shopping but many shoppers’ utility falls. Policymakers should take care.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010930708
the implicit function theory. …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010743667
This note combines a dynamic industrial organization model, in which an industry is subject to exogenous processes of market-size and collusion structure, with a consumption-based asset pricing model for the shares in the industry’s firms. Three main findings emerge for our model under the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010576404
It is shown in this paper that there exist cost innovations for which a monopolist has a higher incentive to invest than a social planner. This unveils the limits of the claim, based on Arrow (1959), that a monopoly always has a lower incentive to innovate than a social planner and therefore...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010580490
Costs necessary to conform with rules and regulations governing market access (i.e. compliance costs) are uncertain prior to export or collection of information which is not cost free for an individual firm. In this paper, we extend the heterogeneous firm model of Melitz to analyze how an...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010594160