Showing 1 - 10 of 177
This paper develops a simple test à la Pesaran (2007) for the null hypothesis of stationarity in heterogeneous panel data with cross-sectional dependence in the form of a common factor in the disturbance. We also allow for serial correlation.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011041587
In this paper, we test the Prebish–Singer (PS) hypothesis, which states that real commodity prices decline in the long run, using two recent powerful panel data stationarity tests accounting for cross-sectional dependence and a structural break. We find that the hypothesis cannot be rejected...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010594094
Ng (2008) shows how the cross-sectional variance of the observed panel data can be used to construct a simple test for the proportion of non-stationary units. However, in the case with incidental trends the test is distorted. The present note shows how the distortions can be substantially...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011076542
In this paper we use the approximate bias expressions developed in Yu (2012) and Bao et al. (2013) to improve the testing of the ordinary least squares or quasi-maximum likelihood estimator of the mean reversion parameter in continuous time models. We follow the approach given in Iglesias and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011041801
In this paper, we consider a cointegrated panel data model with non-stationary common factors, which, because of its …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010688093
This paper theoretically explains why bias correction appears in two statistics recently developed by Baltagi et al. (2011, 2012), which are designed to test the sphericity and cross-sectional dependence of the errors in the fixed effects panel model respectively. Our explanation shows that the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011041555
In an influential paper, Pesaran [Pesaran, M.H. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica 74, 967–1012] proposes a very simple estimator of factor-augmented regressions that has since then become very popular. In this note...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011041647
Applications of panel unit root tests have become commonplace in empirical economics, yet there are ambiguities as how best to interpret the test results. This note clarifies that rejection of the panel unit root hypothesis should be interpreted as evidence that a statistically significant...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010594095
stationary panel data model. In this contribution, we study the use of Hausman-type statistics based on the CCE estimator of …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011263407
In this note we extend the method proposed in Bun and Carree (2006) to the more general PVARX(1) model and show that the iterative procedure is not consistent for fixed T. Subsequently we provide corrected version of the bias correction procedure which is fixed T consistent and robust to both...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011041565