Showing 1 - 7 of 7
This rejoinder to Roemer (this issue) examines Roemer's amendment to his EOp criterion, explains the similarities and differences between Roemer's approach to equality of opportunity and the economic literature inspired by the fair allocation theory, and proposes some clarifications on the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010932102
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010747648
It has become accepted that social choice is impossible in the absence of interpersonal comparisons of well-being. This view is challenged here. Arrow obtained an impossibility theorem only by making unreasonable demands on social choice functions. With reasonable requirements, one can get very...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008782885
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008783218
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008783381
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008783396
We consider a special set of risky prospects in which the outcomes are either life or death (or, more generally, binary utilities). There are various alternatives to the <italic>utilitarian</italic> objective of minimizing the expected loss of lives in such prospects. We start off with the two-person case with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011067413