Showing 1 - 10 of 321
A conservation good, such as the rainforest, is a hostage: it is possessed by S who may prefer to consume it, but B receives a larger value from continued conservation. A range of prices would make trade mutually beneficial. So, why doesn't B purchase conservation, or the forest, from S?
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012461249
Risk and time are intertwined. The present is known while the future is inherently risky. Discounted expected utility … robust violations of discounted expected utility, inconsistent with both prospect theory probability weighting and models …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012462308
to estimate random utility models, as if they are data on actual choices. Stated choices may differ from actual ones …. This paper shows how to use elicited choice probabilities to estimate random utility models with random coefficients and …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012464196
-pecuniary component of utility associated with each choice alternative. Previous work has found that, without parametric restrictions or …-pecuniary component of utility associated with each choice alternative. We develop nonparametric estimators corresponding to two …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012464700
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012510930
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012510980
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012886923
expected utility (GEU) to the diversification of agents who maximize the conventional expected utility (EU). Specifically, we … derive the patterns of diversification for agents who maximize a rank-dependent' expected utility, attaching more weight to … bad' than to good' outcomes, in contrast to the probability weights used in a conventional expected utility maximization …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012472856
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011821632
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011939734