Showing 1 - 10 of 35
Tests for relative predictive accuracy have become a widespread addendum to forecast comparisons. Many empirical research reports conclude that the difference between the entertained forecasting models is 'insignificant'. This paper collects arguments that cast doubt on the usefulness of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010292782
In most of the empirical research on capital markets, stock market indexes are used as proxies for the aggregate market development. In previous work we found that a particular market segment might be less efficient than the whole market and hence easier to forecast. In this paper we extend the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010291063
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014465296
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011474568
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008775751
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008674031
We use data generated by a macroeconomic DSGE model to study the relative benefits of forecast combinations based on forecast-encompassing tests relative to simple uniformly weighted forecast averages across rival models. Assumed rival models are four linear autoregressive specifications, one of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010294019
We investigate whether and to what extent multiple encompassing tests may help determine weights for forecast averaging in a standard vector autoregressive setting. To this end we consider a new test-based procedure, which assigns non-zero weights to candidate models that add information not...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010294025
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010510910
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010517772