Showing 1 - 5 of 5
This document is the technical annex to the full paper "Why Did the Byrd Amendment Not Fly with the WTO?" which is available separately.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005803533
This paper reviews the U.S.-Canada softwood lumber dispute over the past two decades by outlining the key developments and critically appraising the arguments put forward by both countries. It also presents a welfare analysis of lumber trade distortions. Given the importance of lumber trade...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005803541
Since the United States and Canada could not resolve their contentious dispute on lumber trade, both countries approached the World Trade Organization to resolve this long-running disagreement. Each country filed three petitions covering (a) countervailing duties (CVD), (b) antidumping, and (c)...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005041626
This document is the technical annex to the full paper "Recent Developments in the US-Canadian Softwood Lumber Diputes" which is available separately.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005477178
Since its passage in 2000, the Byrd Amendment has been the focal point of ongoing disputes over the acceptable scope of antidumping laws and fair protection of domestic industry. Most countries possess antidumping laws that allow for duties to be placed on imported dumped goods. The Byrd...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005477190