Showing 1 - 10 of 14
Climate policy poses a dilemma for environmental economists. The economic argument for stringent GHG abatement is far from clear. There is disagreement among both climate scientists and economists over the likelihood of alternative climate outcomes, over the nature and extent of the uncertainty...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013104077
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012240370
There is a lot we know about climate change, but there is also a lot we don't know. Even if we knew how much CO2 will be emitted over the coming decades, we wouldn't know how much temperatures will rise as a result. And even if we could predict the extent of warming that will occur, we can say...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013306636
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010528720
In recent articles, I have argued that integrated assessment models (IAMs) have flaws that make them close to useless as tools for policy analysis. IAM-based analyses of climate policy create a perception of knowledge and precision that is illusory, and can fool policy-makers into thinking that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013024159
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003873011
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003932471
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009569481
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009784785
Climate policy is complicated by the considerable compounded uncertainties over the costs and benefits of abatement. We don't even know the probability distributions for future temperatures and impacts, making cost-benefit analysis based on expected values challenging to say the least. There are...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013138396