Showing 1 - 10 of 23
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010532208
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010532247
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009709700
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002495832
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001690227
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001690228
Damage compensation claims in case of cartels are supposed to increase deterrence, compensate losses and increase efficiency. I show that such claims can instead have adverse effects: If suppliers or buyers of cartelists are compensated in proportion to the profits lost due to the cartel,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013074160
This paper studies the effect of forward contracts on the stability of collusion among firms, competing in supply functions on the spot market. A forward market can increase the range of discount factors which allow to sustain collusion. On the contrary, collusion is destabilised when a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012892555
I study a case of market sharing agreements to provide evidence of coordination between colluding firms on the degree to which they compete against each other (henceforth referred to as head-to-head competition) and their bidding behavior. I also quantify the impact that coordinating...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012858034
There is a growing concern that minority shareholding (MS) in rival firms may facilitate collusion. To examine this concern, we exploit the fact that leniency programs (LPs) are generally recognized as a shock that destabilizes collusive agreements and study the effect that the introduction of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012932566