Showing 1 - 4 of 4
We examine a primary outcome of corporate governance, the ability to identify and terminate poorly performing CEOs, to test the effectiveness of U.S. investor protections in improving the corporate governance of cross-listed firms. We find that firms from weak investor protection regimes that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012731545
We investigate how investor protection influences the blockholder-bondholder conflict. We focus on family blockholders, the typical blockholders with high control motivations and the most common type of concentrated ownership, because blockholder-bondholders agency conflicts are clearest in this...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012710042
Using a sample of about 90,000 observations from 38 countries over the 2001-2012 period, we provide three novel findings regarding say on pay (SoP) laws. First, we find robust evidence that SoP laws reduce CEO pay growth rates at firms. Second, such laws decrease the portion of total top...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013062816
This paper examines the effects of say on pay (SoP) laws on CEO compensation, the portion of top management pay captured by CEOs, and firm valuation. Using a large cross-country sample of about 103,000 firm-year observations from 39 countries, we document that compared to our control group of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014121084