Showing 1 - 10 of 179
The main purpose of this article is to advance a set of conditions which demand-revealing mechanisms must pass in order to be politically acceptable for real-world applications and - to begin with - for real-world experiments. Without such non-laboratory experiments, real progress seems unlikely...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005785124
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005685501
The purpose of this paper is to describe a test involving five different approaches to estimating the demand for a public good. The test was conducted in a setting which permitted a real collective choice and in which each subject was committed to actual payments when relevant. The results...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011038700
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011038710
Preference reversal, or choice/reservation-price inconsistency, has been documented experimentally for certain types of lotteries. We argue that the relevance of these findings for real-world markets is uncertain because the type of objects used cannot exist on a market and because the extent to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011038727
The main purpose of this article is to advance a set of conditions which demand-revealing mechanisms must pass in order to be politically acceptable for real-world applications and - to begin with - for real-world experiments. Without such non-laboratory experiments, real progress seems unlikely...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011038743
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011038769
The robust laboratory evidence of preference reversal for lotteries has been interpreted as a threat to the general vailidity of standard theories of decision-making under uncertainty. This evidence is obtained from laboratory, that is, not real-world, lotteries with subjects who have not sought...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011038782
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005432537
The robust laboratory evidence of preference reversal for lotteries has been interpreted as a threat to the general vailidity of standard theories of decision-making under uncertainty. This evidence is obtained from laboratory, that is, not real-world, lotteries with subjects who have not sought...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005432538