Showing 1 - 10 of 13
We report three repetitions of Falk and Kosfeld's (2006) low and medium control treatmentswith 364 subjects. Each repetition employs a sample drawn from a standard subject pool ofstudents and demographics vary across samples. Our results largely conict with those of theoriginal study. We mainly...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005870900
attempts to shed some light on the independenceof observations between experiments, if they are generated by the same subjects.[...] …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009022174
In impunity games proposers, like allocators in dictator games, can take what they want; however, responders can refuse offers deemed unsatisfactory at own cost. We modify the impunity game via allowing offers to condition of another participant's counterfactual generosity intention. For a given...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012227729
How are allocation results affected by information that another anonymous participant intends to be more or less generous? We explore this experimentally via two participants facing the same allocation task with only one actually giving after possible adjustment of own generosity based on the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011852738
We investigate to what extent genuine social preferences can explain observed other-regarding behavior. In a dictator game variant subjects can choose whether to learn about the consequences of their choice for the receiver. We find that a majority of subjects showing other-regarding behavior...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010369389
explained by avoiding cognitive dissonance as in Konow (2000). Our experiment’s choice data is in line with this approach. In …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009752432
In impunity games proposers, like allocators in dictator games, can take what they want; however, responders can refuse offers deemed unsatisfactory at own cost. We modify the impunity game via allowing offers to condition of another participant’s counterfactual generosity intention. For a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012014804
How are allocation results affected by information that another anonymous participant intends to be more or less generous? We explore this experimentally via two participants facing the same allocation task with only one actually giving after possible adjustment of own generosity based on the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011849321
explained by avoiding cognitive dissonance as in Konow (2000). Our experiment’s choice data is in line with this approach. In …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008839368
We study interaction effects between intra-firm conflicts and interfirm competitionon a duopolistic market with seller firms employing one or more agents and imple-menting tournament incentives. We show that inter-firm competition leads to higherincentive intensity, higher efforts and output...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866426