Showing 1 - 10 of 40
Two pairs of two participants each interact repeatedly in two structurally independent but informationally linked Prisonerś Dilemma games. Neither pair receives feedback about past choices by their own partner but is fully informed about the choices by the other pair. Considering this as a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010252395
We study framing effects in repeated social dilemmas by comparing payoff-equivalent Give- and Take-framed public goods games under varying matching mechanisms (Partners or Strangers) and levels of feedback (Aggregate or Individual). In the Give-framed game, players contribute to a public good,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011383730
Initiated by the seminal work of Fehr and Fischbacher (Evolution and Human Behavior (2004)), a large body of research has shown that people often take punitive actions towards norm violators even when they are not directly involved in transactions. This paper shows in an experimental setting...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012493242
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003647905
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003648081
reciprocity in a laboratory experiment. After a group identity manipulation, subjects played a Prisoner's Dilemma with others from …'s group, compared to a third group. We use our experiment to develop hypotheses about group reciprocity and its correlates …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008688480
public goods with positive externalities. -- Public good ; experiment ; groups ; Spillover Game ; social dilemma …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003952498
explained by avoiding cognitive dissonance as in Konow (2000). Our experiment's choice data is in line with this approach. In …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008746951
This paper reports an experiment which compares behaviour in two punishment regimes: (i) a standard public goods game …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011380878
Explaining human cooperation in large groups of non-kin is a major challenge to both rational choice theory and the theory of evolution. Recent research suggests that group cooperation can be explained by positing that cooperators can punish non-cooperators or cheaters. The experimental evidence...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009751389