Similar Search Results

The strategy method risks conflating confusion with a social preference for conditional cooperation in public goods games

Burton-Chellew, Maxwell N.; D'Amico, Victoire; Guérin, … - In: Games 13 (2022) 6, pp. 1-10

The strategy method is often used in public goods games to measure an individual's willingness to cooperate depending on the level of cooperation by their groupmates (conditional cooperation). However, while the strategy method is informative, it risks conflating confusion with a desire for fair...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014418083

Explaining cooperative behavior in public goods games : how preferences and beliefs affect contribution levels

Ackermann, Kurt A.; Murphy, Ryan O. - In: Games 10 (2019) 1/15, pp. 1-34

individual level using multiple methods, and at multiple times during the experiment. With this rich set of predictor variables …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012015524

Do economists punish less?

Kaiser, Jonas Pilgaard; Pedersen, Kasper Selmar; Koch, … - In: Games 9 (2018) 4/75, pp. 1-17

whether to engage in costly punishment of a free rider in a survey-based experiment with 1423 students from seven study areas …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011905088

Introduction to the special issue "pro-sociality and cooperation"

Ghidoni, Riccardo - In: Games 12 (2021) 3, pp. 1-2

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012649172

A choice prediction competition for a social preferences in simple extensive form games : an introduction

Ert, Eyal; Erev, Ido; Roth, Alvin E. - In: Games 2 (2011) 3, pp. 257-276

and the other on predicting the choices of the second mover. The competitions are based on an estimation experiment and a … competition experiment. The two experiments use the same methods and subject pool, and examine games randomly selected from the … same distribution. The current introductory paper presents the results of the estimation experiment, and clarifies the …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009752422

Giving to versus taking from in- and out-group members

Alt, Marius; Gallier, Carlo; Schlüter, Achim; Nelson, … - In: Games 9 (2018) 3/57, pp. 1-14

In this experiment, we test whether subjects’ responses to variations in the action set in a dictator game depends on …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011891039

Patience or fairness? : analyzing social preferences in repeated games

Duffy, John; Muñoz-García, Félix - In: Games 3 (2012) 1, pp. 56-77

This paper investigates how the introduction of social preferences affects players’ equilibrium behavior in both the one-shot and the infinitely repeated version of the Prisoner’s Dilemma game. We show that fairness concerns operate as a ”substitute” for time discounting in the...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009752853

Punishment strategies across societies : conventional wisdoms reconsidered

Suleiman, Ramzi; Samid, Yuval - In: Games 12 (2021) 3, pp. 1-23

reconsiders the generality of both explanations. Using data from a public goods experiment with punishment, conducted by the …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012607461

Homophily and social norms in experimental network formation games

Arifovic, Jasmina; Danese, Giuseppe - In: Games 9 (2018) 4/83, pp. 1-22

both homophily and social norms in a controlled environment. At the beginning of our experiment, each player fills in a …

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011993333

Hybrid assessment scheme based on the stern-judging rule for maintaining cooperation under indirect reciprocity

Okada, Isamu; Yamamoto, Hitoshi; Uchida, Satoshi - In: Games 11 (2020) 1/13, pp. 1-10

Intensive studies on indirect reciprocity have explored rational assessment rules for maintaining cooperation and several have demonstrated the effects of the stern-judging rule. Uchida and Sasaki demonstrated that the stern-judging rule is not suitable for maintaining cooperative regimes in...

Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012167923