Showing 1 - 6 of 6
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012632729
Responses of inattentive or inconsistent subjects in stated-choice (SC) surveys can lead to imprecise or biased estimates. Several SC studies have investigated inconsistency and most of these studies dropped subjects who were inconsistent. However, none of these studies reported who is more...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008497514
This study uses stated-preference (SP) analysis to measure willingness to pay (WTP) to reduce acute episodes of respiratory and cardiovascular ill health. The SP survey employs a modified version of the health state descriptions used in the Quality of Well Being (QWB) Index. The four health...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005689988
In conjoint analysis (CA) studies, choosing between scenarios with multiple health attributes may be demanding for respondents. This study examined whether simplifying the choice task in CA designs, by using a design with more overlap of attribute levels, provides advantages over standard...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005442693
Willingness-to‐pay (WTP) estimates derived from discrete‐choice experiments (DCEs) generally assume that the marginal utility of income is constant. This assumption is consistent with theoretical expectations when costs are a small fraction of total income. We analyze the results of five...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008835159
Background: Patient preferences can affect colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test use. We compared utility-based preferences for alternative CRC screening tests from a stated-preference discrete-choice survey of the general population and physicians in Canada and the United States. <P>Methods:...</p>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008558602