Allocation rules for cooperative games can be manipulated by coalitions merging into single players, or, conversely, players splitting into a number of smaller units. This paper collects some (im)possibility results on merging- and splitting-proofness of (core) allocation rules for cooperative...

This article considers single-valued solutions of transferable utility cooperative games that satisfy core selection and aggregate monotonicity, defined either on the set of all games, G <Superscript> N </Superscript>, or on the set of essential games, E <Superscript> N </Superscript> (those with a non-empty imputation set). The main result is that...</superscript></superscript>

Uniform competitive solutions are stable configurations of proposals predicting coalition formation and effective payoffs. Such "solutions" exist for almost all properly defined cooperative games and, therefore, can be proposed as substitute of the core. The new existence results obtained in the...

The Banzhaf value is the only value satisfying the equal treatment, dummy player and marginal contributions conditions and neutrality of some linear operators on the spaces of games. Under some of these neutrality assumptions, equal treatment can be replaced by even weaker conditions. For linear...

Three solution concepts for cooperative games with random payoffs are introduced. These are the marginal value, the dividend value and the selector value. Inspiration for their definitions comes from several equivalent formulations of the Shapley value for cooperative TU games. An example shows...

We prove that for superadditive games a necessary and sufficient condition for the bargaining set to coincide with the core is that the monotonic cover of the excess game induced by a payoff be balanced for each imputation in the bargaining set. We present some new results obtained by verifying...