Showing 1 - 10 of 459
We use a two-person public goods experiment to distinguish betweene±ciency and fairness as possible motivations for … indicatethat fairness (or inequality aversion) is more in°uential than e±ciency indriving behavior. …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866570
fairness’ on the part ofthose subsequently chosen to be dictators. In fact, dictators were significantlymore likely to offer …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005866591
induce more 'fairness' on the part of those subsequently chosen to be dictators. In fact, dictators were significantly more …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010263797
induce more 'fairness' on the part of those subsequently chosen to be dictators. In fact, dictators were signiï¬cantly more …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005051032
In economic theory, utility depends on past, present and future outcomes. The experiment described in this paper suggests that utility also depends on people's attitudes, and that it can easily be manipulated through these attitudes. The results imply, first, that purely outcome-based models of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010263885
In economic theory, utility depends on past, present and future outcomes. The experiment described in this paper suggests that utility also depends on people's attitudes, and that it can easily be manipulated through these attitudes. The results imply, ?rst, that purely outcome-based models of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005032029
The Theory of Dyadic Morality (TDM; Schein and Gray (2018)) posits that immorality judgments emerge from norm violations, harm perceptions, and negative affect. We test this core prediction in an applied setting: voluntary payment settings, such as the Pay-What-You-Want mechanism. In our study,...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014471658
Human decision making is a process guided by different and partly competing mo-tivations that can each dominate behavior and lead to different effects depending on strength and circumstances. Over-stylizing" neglects such competing concerns and context-dependence, although it facilitates the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010275040
Human decision making is a process guided by different and partly competing motivations that can each dominate behavior and lead to different effects depending on strength and circumstances. "Over-stylizing" neglects such competing concerns and context-dependence, although it facilitates the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005051033
We perform an experimenta linvestigation using a dictator game in which individuals must make a moral decision - to give or not to give an amount of money to poor people in the Third World. A questionnaire in which the subjects are asked about the reasons for their decision shows that, at least...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010263807