Showing 1 - 7 of 7
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005016386
Previous accounting ethics research berates auditors for ethical lapses that contribute to the failure of Andersen (e.g., Duska, R.: 2005, Journal of Business Ethics <Emphasis Type="Bold">57, 17–29; Staubus, G.: 2005, Journal of Business Ethics <Emphasis Type="Bold">57, 5–15; however, some of the blame must also fall on...</emphasis></emphasis>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005719444
The Sarbanes–Oxley Act of 2002 requires audit committees of public companies’ boards of directors to install an anonymous reporting channel to assist in deterring and detecting accounting fraud and control weaknesses. While it is generally accepted that the availability of such a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005719545
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005719551
Recent, well-publicized accounting scandals have shown that the penalties outsiders impose on those found culpable of earnings management can be severe. However, less is known about how colleagues within internal labor markets respond when they believe fellow managers have managed earnings....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005075571
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011155320
CEO compensation has received much attention from both academics and regulators. However, academics have given scant attention to understanding judgments about CEO compensation by third parties such as investors. Our study contributes to the ethics literature on CEO compensation by examining...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011155325