Showing 1 - 10 of 13
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009215359
The discovered preference hypothesis appears to insulate expected utility theory (EU) from disconfirming experimental evidence. It asserts that individuals have coherent underlying preferences, which experiments may not reveal unless subjects have adequate opportunities and incentives to...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005496150
Is the rapid growth of experimental research in economics evidence of a new scientific spirit at work or merely fresh evidence of a misplaced desire to ape the methods of natural sciences? It is often argued that economic experiments are artificial in some sense that tends to render the results...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005462907
Developments in the theory of individual decision-making have been partly shaped by two criteria: a desire for models consistent with experimental evidence; and a pre-commitment to models built on normatively appealing axioms. This paper explores the compatibility of these two selection criteria....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005282272
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009215358
Using as examples Akerlof's 'market for ''lemons''' and Schelling's 'checkerboard' model of racial segregation, this paper asks how economists' abstract theoretical models can explain features of the real world. It argues that such models are not abstractions from, or simplifications of, the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009215368
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009219369
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009219374
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009219459
In this note, I comment on Julian Reiss's paper 'The explanation paradox'. I argue in support of two of the propositions that make up that paradox (that economic models are false, and that they are explanatory) but challenge the third proposition, that only true accounts can explain. I defend...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010717990