Showing 1 - 10 of 13
In Ghirardato et al. (2004) [7], Ghirardato, Macheroni and Marinacci propose a method for distinguishing between perceived ambiguity and the decision-maker[modifier letter apostrophe]s reaction to it. They study a general class of preferences which they refer to as invariant biseparable. This...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009249199
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005159330
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005159750
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005159482
We model decision making under ambiguity based on available data. Decision makers express preferences over actions and data sets. We derive an α-max–min representation of preferences, in which beliefs combine objective characteristics of the data (number and frequency of observations) with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011043018
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005146183
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005153622
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005160123
The idea of representing choice under uncertainty as a trade-off between mean returns and some measure of risk or uncertainty is fundamental to the analysis of investment decisions. In this paper, we show that preferences can be characterized in this way, even in the absence of objective...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010743796
We axiomatize, in an Anscombe–Aumann framework, the class of preferences that admit a representation of the form V(f)=μ−ρ(d), where μ is the mean utility of the act f with respect to a given probability, d is the vector of state-by-state utility deviations from the mean, and ρ(d) is a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011042919