Showing 1 - 4 of 4
We examine the expiration of the IPO quiet period, which occurs after the 25-super-th calendar day following the offering. For IPOs during 1996 to 2000, we find that analyst coverage is initiated immediately for 76 percent of these firms, almost always with a favorable rating. Initiated firms...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005302630
type="main" <title type="main">ABSTRACT</title> <p>We demonstrate that time stamps reported in I/B/E/S for analysts’ recommendations released during trading hours are systematically delayed. Using newswire-reported time stamps, we find 30-minute returns of 1.83% (−2.10%) for upgrades (downgrades), but for this subset of...</p>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011032286
Gross spreads received by underwriters on initial public offerings (IPOs) in the United States are much higher than in other countries. Furthermore, in recent years more than 90 percent of deals raising $20-80 million have spreads of exactly seven percent, three times the proportion of a decade...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005334575
We review the theory and evidence on IPO activity: why firms go public, why they reward first-day investors with considerable underpricing, and how IPOs perform in the long run. Our perspective is threefold: First, we believe that many IPO phenomena are not stationary. Second, we believe...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005334697