Showing 1 - 10 of 59
This paper proposes an axiomatic analysis of Impact Factors when used as tools for ranking journals. This analysis draws on the similarities between the problem of comparing distribution of citations among papers and that of comparing probability distributions on consequences as commonly done in...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010795065
One problem confronting the use of citation-based metrics in science studies and research evaluations is the Matthew effect. This paper reviews the role of citations in science and decomposes the Matthew effect in citations into three components: networking, prestige, and appropriateness. The...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010795096
This paper applies the Ijiri–Simon test for systematic deviations from Gibrat's law to citation numbers of economists. It is found that often-cited researchers attract new citation numbers that are disproportionate to the quality of their work. It is also found that this Matthew effect is...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010795131
This paper investigates the impact of referee reliability on the quality and efficiency of peer review. We modeled peer review as a process based on knowledge asymmetries and subject to evaluation bias. We tested various levels of referee reliability and different mechanisms of reviewing effort...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010795236
variety of academics and practitioners. In their paper acceptance decisions, KM/IC journal editors are not biased towards a …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010795248
We apply the test of Ijiri and Simon (1974) to a large data set of authors in economics. This test has been used by Tol (2009, 2013a) to identify a (within-author) Matthew effect for authors based on citations. We show that the test is quite sensitive to its underlying assumptions and identifies...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011115857
departments in terms of citation impact. Impact is studied under three baselines: journal, ISI/Thomson Reuters subject category … of normalization baseline matters. We observe that normalization against publishing journal is particular. The rankings … of the departments obtained when journal is used as baseline, irrespective of indicator, differ considerably from the …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010795192
approach focuses on the positions of journals in the multidimensional space spanned by the aggregated journal–journal citations …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010795212
In a recent paper in the Journal of Informetrics, Habibzadeh and Yadollahie [Habibzadeh, F., & Yadollahie, M. (2008 …). Journal weighted impact factor: A proposal. Journal of Informetrics, 2(2), 164–172] propose a journal weighted impact factor … (WIF). Unlike the ordinary impact factor, the WIF of a journal takes into account the prestige or the influence of citing …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010795295
-cited papers in each journal is very high. However, as the citation time window becomes wider and wider, the percentage of never … very large; (3) when applying the wider citation time windows, the percentage of never-cited papers for each journal begins …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011039486