Kniffin, Kevin M.; Wansink, Brian - In: Laws 3 (2013) 1, pp. 1-11
<i>Post hoc</i> analyses of <i>Rector v. Arkansas</i> have regularly highlighted that the defendant requested that part of his last meal be saved so that he could it eat later. While the observation is typically raised as part of arguments that Rector was incompetent and unfit for execution, the more basic...