Showing 1 - 10 of 142
Prior studies show that agency conflicts are important in explaining corporate financial policies and that the board of directors is central to corporate governance. In this study, we examine the role of this governing body in the accumulation of cash reserves. Using a sample of 597 French...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011242047
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008925868
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether cumulative voting can help ease the conflicts between board of directors and minority shareholders. Design/methodology/approach – The authors use voting result of shareholder proposals as an indicator of the level of conflicts...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009275428
Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to examine the monitoring effectiveness of insider-dominated boards and outsider-dominated boards on different types of CEOs. Design/methodology/approach -To test whether boards monitor inside CEOs and outside CEOs differently and to compare the sizes of the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010757797
This paper examines whether a bank exercises a monitoring role when a banker is represented on a firm’s board. Bank monitoring reduces information asymmetries, and hence lessens firm’s financial constraints—phenomenon frequently measured by investment-cash flow sensitivity in the sample of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010989435
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008531524
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005029323
Companies are under increasing pressure to have their corporate governance rated by an independent corporate governance metrics firm, such as Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) or Governance Metrics International (GMI). These rating firms claim to be able to determine how effective and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005698965
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005698998
Examining board of directors’ decision making in case studies of CEOs and board members in four US companies, we found that an “inner board” of directors and CEOs linked by network ties outside of board meetings contained the most influential board members who also shared cognitions about...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011242048