Showing 1 - 10 of 28
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005216630
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005521073
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005388122
In the quasilinear case, surplus maximization leads to constrained efficient Drèze equilibria. We investigate the question of whether surplus maximization can be useful beyond the quasilinear case. We use two different surplus concepts, the equivalent and the compensating surplus. The first one...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10008870871
This paper provides four axioms that uniquely characterize the sequential Raiffa solution proposed by Raiffa (1951, 1953) for two-person bargaining games. Three of these axioms are standard and are shared by several popular bargaining solutions. They suffice to characterize these solutions on...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003944553
This article provides an exact non-cooperative foundation of the sequential Raiffa solution for two person bargaining games. Based on an approximate foundation due to Myerson (1997) for any two-person bargaining game (S,d) an extensive form game G^S^d is defined that has an infinity of weakly...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003944582
First via a counter example it is shown that the Proposition 3 of Anbarci & Sun (2013) is false. Then a gap and a mistake in their proof are identified. Finally, a modified version of their Proposition 3 is stated and proved.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010224766
These notes consist of two parts. In the first one I present a counter example to Proposition 3 of Anbarci & Sun (2013). In the second part I propose a correction based on an axiom similar to one used by Salonen (1988) in the first axomatization of the Discrete Raiffa solution.
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009682620
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005374114
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005520953