Showing 1 - 7 of 7
Maccheroni, Marinacci, and Rustichini (2006), in an Anscombe–Aumann framework, axiomatically characterize preferences that are represented by the variational utility functional V(f)=minp∈Δ{∫u(f)dp+c(p)}∀f∈F, where u is a utility function on outcomes and c  is an index of...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011264627
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005520909
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005374379
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005388126
We analyze individual preferences over infinite horizon consumption choices. Our axioms provide the foundation for a recursive representation of the utility function that contains as particular cases the classical Koopmans representation (Koopmans (1960)) as well as the habit formation...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011118009
We report a surprising link between optimal portfolios generated by a special type of variational preferences called divergence preferences (see Maccheroni et al., 2006) and optimal portfolios generated by classical expected utility. As a special case, we connect optimization of truncated...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011065388
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005388303