Showing 1 - 4 of 4
A possibility of the existence of a discontinuity of Prelec’s (probability weighting) function W(p) at the probability p = 1 is discussed. This possibility is supported by the Aczél–Luce question whether Prelec’s weighting function W(p) is equal to 1 at p = 1, by the purely mathematical...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011109059
A need for experiments on the certainty effect near the certainty (near the probability p = 1) is stated in this paper. The need supported by the Aczél–Luce question whether Prelec’s weighting function W(p) is equal to 1 at p = 1, by the purely mathematical restrictions and the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011109350
include the certain outcomes, cannot be unquestionably correct. The experiment of Starmer and Sugden (1991) evidently supports …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011112848
This is a very draft version of the report "The random-lottery incentive system. Can p~1 experiments deductions be correct?". It is published to extend the abstract of the report. Aczél and Luce emphasized a fundamental question: whether W(1)=1 (whether the Prelec weighting function equals 1 at...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011112592