Showing 1 - 10 of 10
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003673467
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10002156432
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003198024
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003198067
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003198094
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10001432787
Svensson (2003) argues strongly that specific targeting rules-first-order optimality conditions for a specific objective function and model-are normatively superior to instrument rules for the conduct of monetary policy. That argument is based largely on four main objections to the latter, plus...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005415103
The names Milton Friedman and John Taylor are associated with different monetary policy rules; but, as shown in this paper, the difference between their perceptions of how the economy works is not great. The monetary policy rules advanced by Taylor and Friedman are compared by linking the rules...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005415355
This paper reviews the distinction between the timeless perspective and discretionary modes of monetary policymaking, the former representing rule-based policy as formalized by Woodford (1999). In models with forward-looking expectations, this distinction is important because discretionary...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005519720
The following are comments in response to Lars Svensson's "Targeting versus Instrument Rules for Monetary Policy: What Is Wrong with McCallum and Nelson?"
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005725975