Showing 1 - 10 of 260
We study a difference-in-differences (DiD) framework where groups experience unequal treatment statuses in the pre-policy change period. This approach is commonly employed in empirical studies but it contradicts the canonical model's assumptions. We show that in such settings, the standard DiD...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014247985
We study the interpretation of regressions with multiple treatments and flexible controls. Such regressions are often used to analyze stratified randomized control trials with multiple intervention arms, to estimate value-added (for, e.g., teachers) with observational data, and to leverage the...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013334327
training affects worker sorting to firms, sample selection is no longer binary but is "multilayered". This paper extends the … canonical Heckman (1979) sample selection model - which assumes selection is binary - to a setting where it is multilayered, and …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10015072893
We estimate the unconditional distribution of the marginal propensity to consume (MPC) using clustering regression applied to the 2008 economic stimulus payments. By deviating from the standard approach of estimating MPC heterogeneity using interactions with observables, we can recover the full...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014544800
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011432273
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011436501
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011521623
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010440113
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10014014402
This timely book makes a forceful argument that the analyses from behavioral economists are incomplete, the policies advocated by libertarian paternalists are misguided and unethical, and both actually reinforce the cognitive biases and dysfunctions that motivate 'nudges' in the first place. In...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012106389