Showing 1 - 10 of 700
This paper presents an overview of the history of corporate governance in the United States, emphasizing the period before the advent of federal securities laws and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Recent research has overturned many widely accepted beliefs about corporate...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012458311
We use the Business Roundtable's challenge to the SEC's 2010 proxy access rule as a natural experiment to measure the value of shareholder proxy access. We find that firms that would have been most vulnerable to proxy access, as measured by institutional ownership and activist institutional...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012460861
differences, summarize their consequences, and assess potential strategies of corporate governance reform. We argue that the legal … approach is a more fruitful way to understand corporate governance and its reform than the conventional distinction between …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012471353
the relevant parties. Contract theory provides a set of necessary conditions under which governance reform can be welfare …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012466619
This paper examines the determinants of firm stock-price performance from 1990 to 1993" in Japan. During that period of …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012472574
This paper develops a dynamic continuous-time model in which international risk sharing can yield substantial welfare gains through its positive effect on expected consumption growth. The mechanism linking global diversification to growth is an attendant world portfolio shift from safe, but...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012474883
investors have begun to play an important governance role in Japan. However, the main bank does not abandon its governance role …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012453899
, Germany, Japan, India, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Together, the studies …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012467625
The development of U.S. state takeover law in the past three decades has produced considerable and quite possibly excessive protection for incumbent managers from hostile takeovers. Although the shortcomings of state takeover law have been widely recognized, there has been little support for...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012470578
This paper analyzes certain important shortcomings of state competition in corporate law. In particular, we show, with respect to takeovers, states have incentives to produce rules that excessively protect incumbent managers. The development of state takeover law, we argue, is consistent with...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012471028