Showing 1 - 8 of 8
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10009215588
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010641847
This paper examines the small-sample performance of several information based criteria that can be employed to facilitate data dependent endogeneity correction in estimation of cointegrated panel regressions. The Monte Carlo evidence suggests that the criteria generally perform well but that...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005186679
This paper proposes new error correction-based cointegration tests for panel data. The limiting distributions of the tests are derived and critical values provided. Our simulation results suggest that the tests have good small-sample properties with small size distortions and high power relative...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005682220
This paper proposes a Lagrange multiplier (LM) test for the null hypothesis of cointegration that allows for the possibility of multiple structural breaks in both the level and trend of a cointegrated panel regression. The test is general enough to allow for endogenous regressors, serial...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005682321
type="main" xml:lang="en" <title type="main">Abstract</title> <p>One of the most cited studies within the field of binary choice models is that of Klein and Spady (1993), in which the authors propose a semiparametric estimator for use when the distribution of the error term is unknown. However, although theoretically...</p>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011031998
This paper develops a very simple test for the null hypothesis of no cointegration in panel data. The test is general enough to allow for heteroskedastic and serially correlated errors, unit-specific time trends, cross-sectional dependence and unknown structural breaks in both the intercept and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10005276705
type="main" xml:id="obes12050-abs-0001" <title type="main">Abstract</title> <p>First-differencing is generally taken to imply the loss of one observation, the first, or at least that the effect of ignoring this observation is asymptotically negligible. However, this is not always true, as in the case of generalized least...</p>
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011202328