Showing 1 - 8 of 8
This paper examines whether, in addition to standard unit root and cointegration tests, panel approaches also produce test statistics behaving erratically when applied to tests for PPP. We show that if appropriate tests (which are robust to cross-sectional dependence and more powerful than...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003394591
We propose new tests for panel cointegration by extending the panel unit root of Choi [2001] and Maddala and Wu [1999] to the panel cointegration case. The tests are flexible, intuitively appealing and relatively easy to compute. We investigate the finite sample behavior in a simulation study....
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003482776
We use meta analytic combination procedures to develop new tests for panel cointegration. The main idea consists in combining p-values from time series cointegration tests on the different units of the panel. The tests are robust to heterogeneity as well as to cross-sectional dependence between...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003394598
Time series cointegration tests, even in the presence of large sample sizes, often yield conflicting conclusions ("mixed signalsʺ) as measured by, inter alia, a low correlation of empirical p-values [see Gregory et al., 2004, Journal of Applied Econometrics]. Using their methodology, we present...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003394608
This paper suggests a combination procedure to exploit the imperfect correlation of cointegration tests to develop a more powerful meta test. To exemplify, we combine Engle and Granger (1987) and Johansen (1988) tests. Either of these underlying tests can be more powerful than the other one...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10003835921
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012548351
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10013286262
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10012543286