Showing 1 - 10 of 15
experiments were undergraduate students of economics and business administration who self-selected into their field of study and …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010334011
Several recent papers argue that contracts provide reference points that affect ex post behavior. We test this hypothesis in a canonical buyer-seller relationship with renegotiation. Our paper provides causal experimental evidence that an initial contract has a highly significant and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010333816
party. Examples include business gifts of firms and lobbyists. In a series of experiments, we show that, even without …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010333734
, inducing them to resist entering into employment contracts. This resistance to employment contracts vanishes if fairness …
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010333940
Chapter written for the Handbook of Reciprocity, Gift-Giving and Altruism
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010334040
Pay What You Want (PWYW) and Name Your Own Price (NYOP) are customerdriven pricing mechanisms that give customers (some) pricing power. Both have been used in service industries with high fixed capacity costs in order to appeal to additional customers by reducing prices without setting a...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10011350830
We propose a theory of ex post inefficient renegotiation that is based on loss aversion. When two parties write a long-term contract that has to be renegotiated after the realization of the state of the world, they take the initial contract as a reference point to which they compare gains and...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010333896
For the procurement of complex goods the early exchange of information is important to avoid costly renegotiation ex post. We show that this is achieved by bilateral negotiations but not by auctions. Negotiations strictly outperforms auctions if sellers are likely to have superior information...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010520618
In this paper we reply to Binmore and Shaked's criticism of the Fehr-Schmidt model of inequity aversion. We put the theory and their arguments into perspective and show that their criticism is not substantiated. Finally, we briefly comment on the main challenges for future research on social...
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010333922
Persistent link: https://www.econbiz.de/10010333812